Google’s decision to stop providing historical satellite imagery for India has raised concerns about the company’s commitment to transparency and the Indian government’s control over access to information. This development highlights the importance of balancing perplexity and burstiness to promote open access to information while respecting local laws and customs.

Perplexity refers to the degree of uncertainty or confusion in information, while burstiness refers to the concentration of information in a particular time or place. In the case of historical satellite imagery, the data can be both perplexing and bursty. It can be difficult to interpret and understand without proper context and analysis, but it can also reveal significant patterns and trends over time.

Google’s decision to remove historical satellite imagery for India may have been influenced by the country’s tightening control over the internet and digital technologies. However, it is also possible that the decision was made for other reasons, such as technical limitations or changes in business priorities.

Regardless of the reasons behind the decision, it is important to balance perplexity and burstiness to promote transparency and accountability while respecting local laws and customs. Technology companies like Google have a responsibility to promote free speech and open access to information, but they must also operate within the legal and cultural frameworks of the countries in which they operate.